#7 days to die leather armor full#

#7 days to die leather armor full#

As a rule all bonuses to armor class that normally apply to an armored character in 5e should still apply to an armored characterвЂ™s touch ac.ДЄrmor protection is a form of reduction in damage that armor grants the wearer which protects the wearer from all forms of hitpoint damage unless an attack roll is made to exceed the wearerвЂ™s full armor class. This naturally high bonus to full armor class means that some outside bonuses to armor class could be too much, thus as a dm you must decide whether some bonuses to ac stack with full armor class or only apply to touch ac. The full armor class bonus from armor is high, because it represents how much of a wearerвЂ™s body this armor covers, which is often 85% or more, very hard to hit around without great skill. Glancing represents a plate armorвЂ™s ability to deflect a blow that would still hit a character not wearing that armor.

Some armors have the glancing quality, this quality gives them some touch ac making it a bit of a holdover from how D&D normally handles ac from armor but to a lesser degree. This system re-introduces the concept of touch ac as a form of armor class that exists outside a characters bonus from armor, when an attack is made, it is made against touch ac plus full armor class, if the attack fails to pass touch ac, then it deals no damage, if it exceeds touch ac but not full armor class, then armor protection applies, if an attack exceeds full armor class (which is always does on a roll where the die lands on 20) then the weapon deals damage without armor protection.ДЇull armor class is in addition to touch ac, to calculate full armor class, add it on top of touch ac. i kinda think 'why not both?' so here you goДЄlso here's a google doc's version with commenting enabled Realistic armor D&D 5e So I'm not really a huge fan of 5e, but i got into a discussion the other night with someone on discord about realistic armor, they sent a video about a guy refuting another guy i watch on youtube's argument that armor should not be based on AC but instead damage resistance.